Chapter
5 - SALE
OF PERSONAL PROPERTY
501: Overview.
Income from the sale of personal property is sourced based on the
residence of the Seller. Code
Sec. 865(a). Income from the sale, exchange or other disposition of
personal property by a U.S. resident is U.S. source.
Conversely, income from the sale by a nonresident is foreign
source. Code Sec. 865(a).
There are specific exceptions to this general rule that apply to
the sale of inventory, depreciable personal property, intangibles and
stock of affiliates. As a
result, generally only portfolio stocks, bonds, or other financial
instruments would fall within the general rule.
505: In General
Sourcing for the sale of personal property is based on the
residence of the seller. Where
the seller is a resident of the United States, a gain from the sale of
personal property will be U.S. source and where the residence of the
seller is other than the U.S., the gain from the sale of personal
property will be foreign source. Code
Sec. 865(a). A United
States resident includes the following:
(1) Any individual who is a United States Citizen,
(2) A U.S. Resident Alien with a tax home in the United States,
(3) A Nonresident Alien with a tax home in the United States, and
(4) Any U.S. corporation, U.S. trust or U.S. estate.
Code Sec. 865(g)(1)(A).
A nonresident means any person other than a United States
resident. Code Sec.
865(g)(1)(B).
In the case of a partnership, the seller’s residence shall be
determined at the partner level. Code
Sec. 865(i)(5). However,
where the partnership is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, each
partner shall be treated as having effectively connected income.
Code Sec. 875(1).
Example
1: USP is a
partnership organized in the United States and has two partners, Mr. USA
and Mr. NRA. USP is not
engaged in a U.S. trade or business and sells rare antique coins in
Europe. The source of the income from the sale of these coins shall
be U.S. source for partner Mr. USA and foreign source for partner Mr.
NRA.
To
determine whether an individual is a resident for sourcing the income
from the sale of a personal property, a determination of the
individual’s tax home needs to be made.
An individual’s tax home is generally his principle place of
business or if the individual has no regular place of business because
of the nature of his business, then its his regular place of abode in a
real and substantial sense. Reg.
§ 1.911-2(b).
Example
2: Mrs. NRA came to
America to study in college. While
here, she discovered that Americans enjoy candies prepared from recipes
originating in her home country. She
established a successful business in the United States and it is her
principle business. While
Ms. NRA does not live in the U.S. more than 183 days each year, the sale
of personal property by Ms. NRA will be U.S. source since she is deemed
a resident for sourcing of personal property sales, regardless of
whether they are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business.
Example
3: Mrs. NRA is a
sales woman who travels extensively through the world to sell machinery.
Her house and abode are in Europe.
Mrs. NRA sells a painting in the United States and she does not
spend more than 183 days a year in the United States.
The gain from the sale of this painting would be foreign source
as Mrs. NRA is deemed to be a nonresident for purposes of sourcing the
income from sales of personal property.
While Mrs. NRA does not have a regular place of business she does
have a regular place of abode and therefore her tax home is in Europe.
For further discussion of tax home, see Stand. Fed. Tax Rep. (CCH)
¶ ____.
Example 4: USCO sells
stock in Euro Corp. The
income from the sale of this personal property will be U.S. source as
USCO is a U.S. resident.
515: Exception
for Inventory Property.
(A) In General
Income from the sale of inventory property is generally sourced,
based on the title passage test. Code
Sec. 865(b). If title passes inside the U.S., the income from the sale is
U.S. source. Code Sec.
861(a)(6). If title passes
outside the U.S., income from the sale is foreign source.
Code Sec. 862(a)(6). The term "inventory property"
means stock in trade of the taxpayer or other property of a kind which
would properly be included in the inventory of the taxpayer primarily
for sale to customers in the ordinary course of his trade or business.
Code Sec. 1221(a)(1).
(B) Title Passage Rule
A sale of property is consummated at the time and the place where
the rights, title and interest of the seller in the property are
transferred to the buyer. Commercial
Law should be consulted to determine where title passes.
Generally commercial law provides that a shipment F.O.B. point of
sale results in title passage in the country where the personal property
is shipped. Alternatively,
F.O.B. destination results in title passage when the goods are delivered
at their destination. Title
passes at the point where the benefits and burdens of ownership transfer
from the seller to the buyer. For
this reason, where the seller is required to deliver the products to the
destination, risk of loss does not pass until the products are delivered
at the destination. Likewise,
where the risk of loss transfers to the buyer at the seller’s loading
dock, title is deemed to transfer to the buyer at the seller’s loading
dock.
For the
sales of inventory, tax law generally follows commercial law in sourcing
income; in that the income is sourced in the country where risk of loss
and therefore title passes.
Example 1: F Co.
sells leather furniture to Americans.
F Co.’s terms for sale are F.O.B. their Italian warehouse. Therefore, the source of income from selling this Italian
leather furniture is all foreign source, regardless of the fact that all
of the Italian furniture is used and consumed in the U.S. by U.S.
purchasers.
Example 2: Same as Example
1, except the terms of shipping are F.O.B. USCO’s warehouse in Miami,
Florida. Now the risk of
loss does not shift until the goods are delivered in Miami, Florida.
F Co. would now have U.S. source income from the sale of this
Italian leather furniture.
Planning
Note: With the sale
of inventory, the seller can determine whether they would prefer to have
U.S. source or foreign source income simply by adjusting the terms of
the sale. Where the buyer
desires not to assume the risk of loss until it is delivered, the seller
can still have the risk of loss shift at its warehouse where the
shipping terms are C.I.F. (Cost Insurance and Freight).
C.I.F. means that the buyer pays for the cost of the merchandise
which is shipped F.O.B. seller’s warehouse and also pays for insuring
the product and freight for the product during the time it is in transit
from the seller’s warehouse to the buyer’s warehouse.
For all practical purposes, both parties obtain exactly what they
bargained for and the seller is still provided the opportunity to
classify the sale as a foreign sale.
Where the seller transfers the risk of loss but maintains bear
legal title, the sale is deemed to occur at the time and place of
passage of the beneficial ownership and risk of loss to the seller.
If a sale transaction is arranged in a particular manner for the
primary purpose of tax avoidance, the substance of the transaction will
determine where the sale has occurred.
In such cases, all factors of the transaction, such as
negotiations, execution of the agreement, the location of the property,
and the place of payment will be considered, and the sale is treated as
being consummated at the place where the substance of the sale occurred.
Reg. § 1.861-7(c).
Example
3: USCO sold to its
U.S. customers whiskey which it had purchased from UK Co. The U.S. customers would order whiskey from USCO and USCO
would place the order with UK Co. for the delivery of such whiskey in
America. UK Co. passed
title to USCO when the whiskey was delivered to the ship.
USCO immediately assigned title to the goods to its U.S.
customers. The income which
USCO earned is foreign source, since title passed from USCO to its U.S.
customers in the U.K. Liggett
Groups, Inc. v. Comm. T.C. Memo 1990-18.
The title passage test also applies to sales of inventory by
nonresidents. However,
income from the sale of inventory attributable to a U.S. office or a
fixed place of business of a nonresident is generally treated as U.S.
source even though title passed outside the U.S. Code Sec. 865(e)(2)(A).
Example
4: F Co. has an
office in Miami which materially participates in all of the sales to
South America. All sales
are made F.O.B. F Co.’s shipping dock.
The source of the income from the sale of F Co.’s products will
be U.S. source.
There
is one exception to this special rule, income attributable to a U.S.
office can still be treated as foreign source if the inventory sold for
use outside the U.S. and an office or other fixed place of business of
the taxpayer outside the U.S. materially participates in the sale.
Code Sec. 865(e)(2)(B).
(C) Manufactured Here/Sold There.
(1) In General
There
are special rules for determining the source of income from the sale of
property manufactured in the U.S. and sold outside or manufactured
outside the U.S. and sold in the U.S.
These rules provide that first there must be an allocation of
income between manufacturing profit and selling profit.
Once this allocation has been made, there then needs to be a
sourcing of each type of income to determine what, if any portion, of
each type of profit is attributable to the United States.
For
purposes of allocating profits between manufacturing and selling, the
regulations provide three methods:
(a) 50-50 Method;
(b) Independent Factory Price Method; and
(c) Books and Records Method. Reg.
§ 1.863-3.
(2) 50-50 Method.
The
50-50 Method provides for an even split of gross income between
manufacturing profit and sales profit.
Example
5: USCO produces
microchips and sells them to an unrelated foreign distributor for $100.
USCO’s cost of goods sold is $40 which results in the $60 gross
income from the sale of these microchips.
USCO elects the 50-50 Method and therefore has $30 of gross
income attributable to production activity and $30 of income
attributable to sales activity.
(3) Independent Factory Price Method
(IFP).
An IFP is established where the taxpayer regularly sells part of
its output to wholly independent distributors in such a way as to
reasonably reflect an arm’s length price for the income earned from
the production activity. The
independent factory price would be used to allocate the amount of income
attributable to production and anything above the independent factory
price would be allocated to the sales activity.
An IFP
will only be applied to apportionable sales that are reasonably
contemporaneous with the sale fairly establishing the IFP.
An IFP cannot be applied to sales in other geographic markets, if
the markets are substantially different.
Where the taxpayer elects to apply the IFP Method, the IFP Method
must be applied to all sales and must be applied for the tax
year and each subsequent tax year.
Example
6: USCO
manufactures bicycle wheels which they sell to various independent
distributors throughout the world.
However, USCO sells its bicycle wheels in the U.K. through its
own branch office. USCO sells its wheels to wholesalers outside of the U.S. at
$6 per wheel. USCO’s U.K.
branch is selling these wheels to their retail customers for $10 per
wheel. Where $6 is deemed
to be an IFP, USCO will have $6 U.S. source manufacturing income and $4
foreign source sales income.
Caution:
Where USCO’s $6 price is established in markets which
are geographically different (e.g. third world countries) to the U.K.,
it will not be considered a valid IFP.
For more
information on Independent Factory Pricing and the elements to prove or
disprove the validity of an IFP, see Stand. Fed. Tax Rep. (CCH) ¶ ____.
Caution:
Where the facts in Example 6 involve a foreign manufacturer with
a U.S. sales office, the above-mentioned rules would not apply and 100%
of the income would be U.S. source income.
See ¶555 (B) below.
(4) Books and Records Method.
Where the taxpayer can establish to the
satisfaction of the district director that its book of accounts details
allocation of receipts and expenditures, which clearly reflects the
amount of income from production and sales activities and is unaffected
by considerations of tax liability, then they may receive permission to
use their books and records for apportioning the income between
manufacturing the sales activities.
Reg. § 1.863-3(b)(3).
(5) Sourcing Manufacturing and Sales Income.
After income has been allocated between
manufacturing and sales income, the manufacturing and sales income needs
to be classified as U.S. or foreign source. Reg. § 1.863-3(c).
The formula to source manufacturing income
is as follows:
Manufacturing x
Production Assets in the U.S. =
U.S. Source
Taxable Income Production Assets
Manufacturing
Worldwide
Income
Chapter
1. Introduction
- Source of Income Rules.
Chapter
2. Interest Income, excluding OID and OID Income.
Chapter
3.
Dividend Income.
Chapter
4. Rents and Royalties.
Chapter
6. Services Income.
Chapter
7. U.S. Real
Estate and Other Unique
Income.
Chapter
8. U.S. Tax Rules.